Christines

By the way. Obama wants to bankrupt the coal industry!


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hdi4onAQBWQ

Obama thinks you are bitter bigots!



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UHhd1inexmk

Obama in his own words wants to bankrupt coal industry!


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hdi4onAQBWQ

Obama's "typical white" person remark is only the top of the iceberg! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lI77cU3jsFs

The media has been giving Obama a free ride! Why? ABC finally had the courage to ask some of the tough questions! http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/04/the_rules_change_for_obama.html arack Obama seemed puzzled. Angrily puzzled. The apostle of hope seemed flummoxed by the audacity of the question. At the April 16 Philadelphia debate, George Stephanopoulos, longtime aide to Democratic politicians, was asking about his longtime association with Weather Underground bomber William Ayers. The Weather Underground attacked the Pentagon, the Capitol and other public buildings; Ayers was quoted in The New York Times on Sept. 11, 2001, as saying, "I don't regret setting bombs; I feel we didn't do enough." It was at Ayers' house that Obama's state Senate candidacy was launched in 1995; Obama continued to serve on a nonprofit board with Ayers after the Times article appeared. Obamaites live-blogging the debate were outraged. The press is not supposed to ask such questions. They are supposed to invite the candidates to expatiate on how generous their health care plans are. Or to allow them to proclaim that "we are the change that we are seeking." Or to once again bash George W. Bush.

Why haven't the media people, including ABC, shown Obama's true character? Is this man presidential material or a street thug? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UoOFp-RDpvM http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UHhd1inexmk&eurl=http This is the real Obama!

This was Obama after the debate. Maybe his supporters didn't want to see this side of his character! http://hillbuzz.blogspot.com/2008/04/obama-gave-clinton-finger-at-campaign.html#link As it was expected, Barack Obama and his supporters have dedicated plenty of time to whine and complain about the supposedly unfair treatment that their candidate received from ABC in it’s debate. The claim of most of these characters (and the rest of the Mainstream Media) is that “the issues” were not discussed and instead “petty and irrelevant” subjects like flag pins, Rev. Wright, bitter comments, and his association with a domestic terrorist were given importance in their stead. Apparently, these countless months of campaigning and dozens of debates were not enough for Obama’s followers to already figure out what his (and Clinton’s) policies are. It seems, that we have acquired a new political tradition in this Country, were we believe every single proposal that a politician sends our way, without ever questioning a single aspect of it. Suddenly, we are supposed to throw away thousands of years of accumulated knowledge “out the window”, and instead accept the subjects that a campaign establishes for us, discarding any information that might give us a clue as to who these people really are. http://savagepolitics.com/?p=295